View Single Post
Posts: 4,556 | Thanked: 1,624 times | Joined on Dec 2007
#31
Originally Posted by Rauha View Post
I could write very long list of stuff that Apple has arrived late, but implemented it perfectly once they got there. However, mobile-multitasking would never make it to that list. In fact, it would be on my Apple failure list. It took them years to get there and they managed to copy the worst impementation of it from Symbian.

Apple's recent plunders on multitasking actually remind me how far behind competion they were on that front with OS7-9 around late 80's - late 90'. Mac OS was about decade late to multitasking on desktop, but once it got there on OS X it was divinely good. IPhone OS will get there one day.
Eh, it's debatable whether Apple's implementation of multi-tasking is good or bad. For example, the N900's multi-tasking is more like a computer's multi-tasking. Apps run full throttle (unless they are coded to pause or stop when they lose foreground focus). You have a task manager that manages all the different applications Apple's multitasking (along with Android and I believe Windows Mobile Phone 7 Series) is more for smartphones, where you may or may not need an app to run full throttle.

It's an interesting implementation, I personally don't like it Android's (well maybe not as much I don't know enough about Android's but I heard some apps are closed or save state), Microsoft (I'm going quit saying Windows Mobile Phone 7 Series) and Apple's version of multi-tasking since they seem too restrictive. I much rather have a system where I get to learn yes it's a bad idea to have gpodder, and feedingit update at the exact same time. =P
__________________
Originally Posted by ysss View Post
They're maemo and MeeGo...

"Meamo!" sounds like what Zorro would say to catherine zeta jones... after she slaps him for looking at her dirtily...