View Single Post
Posts: 670 | Thanked: 747 times | Joined on Aug 2009 @ Kansas City, Missouri, USA
#45
Originally Posted by arne.anka View Post
it seems to be _really_ hard for some people to grasp, that asking for the openess of the n900 is not a matter of maemo/meego.
First, why is everything I said 'invalid'? Could it be because you've missed my point entirely?

Second, I understand you are concerned about the openess of the N900 hardware not of Maemo/MeeGo. Why can't you understand Nokia does not have total control over that? And why are you complaining here instead of to those who do control the various closed drivers Nokia does not?

Third, while Nokia's actions so far may not be up to your standards, can you name another major manufacturer of mobile devices with a better attitude toward open standards? Seems to me that with Maemo, now MeeGo, open-sourcing of Symbian and support of open Qt and open-source in general that Nokia is pretty much the open-source leader in mobile devices.
__________________
Registered Linux user #266531.