View Single Post
Posts: 3,319 | Thanked: 5,610 times | Joined on Aug 2008 @ Finland
#19
Originally Posted by krk969 View Post
is there a choice ?, i would definetely want it rolled back.
I for sure dont want to use the PR1.2 until I know a release date, or atleast there is an assurance from Nokia that the formal image of the OS is released within x weeks of the SDK or something along those lines.
Can the community council do something about it , if there is a fair share of support for it , the rollback of autobuilder I mean ?
The issue is discussed, the posts referenced above are actually a result of the preceding council analysis. As for the SDK delay, Nokians themselves on the dev list said the delay is/was essentially bigger then originally intented, but of course with the no release date policy it sadly always includes a certain amount of guesswork. I don't really see a good solution for the simultaneous support of different versions, the choice seems to be that of determining the lesser evil among the various possible scenarios. The simplest would probably be the introduction of an extras-experimental which would have no connection to the other extras repositories and then when the SDK is released, experimental becomes extras-devel...
__________________
Blogging about mobile linux - The Penguin Moves!
Maintainer of PyQt (see introduction and docs), AppWatch, QuickBrownFox, etc
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to attila77 For This Useful Post: