Thread: Maemo Morality
View Single Post
javicq's Avatar
Posts: 94 | Thanked: 319 times | Joined on Mar 2010 @ Barcelona, Spain
#73
Originally Posted by festivalnut View Post
yes i definately find your reasoning behind it more valid (not that anyones reasons are not valid but you know what i mean!) and more what the original question is trying to evoke on a moral level. yet in this instance you are sacrificing the 4 extra lives based on semantics and how you will personally feel about it later. is that the morally right thing to do?
Well, it's all about semantics after all. For you, not taking action means actually killing these people, for me it just means not saving them, which is entirely different.
What's the morally right thing to do? Morality is a largely subjective matter, and while in some very clear scenarios there seems to be universal agreement (eg, killing a man, in a vacuum, is almost universally perceived as a bad thing), in most cases (especially in extreme cases like the ones presented) there is room for interpretation, semantics, and case by case analyses.
I don't think there is a right or bad thing to do, but I do know what would work for me. I don't claim to have the answers, in fact I don't think there's a right answer (actually those that claim to have all the right answers tend to scare the hell out of me )
__________________
If you liked my work, you may donate