View Single Post
Posts: 1,341 | Thanked: 708 times | Joined on Feb 2010
#32
Originally Posted by buurmas View Post
BTW, that last point argues that Nokia should be trying to get Qt 4.6 on as many platforms as possible. If someone could write an open source Qt 4.6 app for Android (for example), when maybe that app could fairly easily run on the N900 as well (for example).
I agree.
On that thought, I really wonder why Nokia stopped QTJambi development; QT for Java.
Maybe even next generation of Swing could be developed over QT; if it is really multiplatform capable.

They should read this in Nokia and rethink the decision:
http://trs-new.jpl.nasa.gov/dspace/handle/2014/18351
Java can be faster and require less battery energy, than same program done in C++ (in family of programs which use relatively much dynamic memory and are run "long" time, like www-browser)