View Single Post
Posts: 3,319 | Thanked: 5,610 times | Joined on Aug 2008 @ Finland
#33
Originally Posted by zimon View Post
I agree.
On that thought, I really wonder why Nokia stopped QTJambi development; QT for Java.
Maybe even next generation of Swing could be developed over QT; if it is really multiplatform capable.
Because it never caught on in the Java world. GUI was never as important there (plus most people already knew swing), and the rest of the framework was mostly just duplicating functionality.

They should read this in Nokia and rethink the decision:
http://trs-new.jpl.nasa.gov/dspace/handle/2014/18351
Java can be faster and require less battery energy, than same program done in C++ (in family of programs which use relatively much dynamic memory and are run "long" time, like www-browser)
I see you like this link and post it over and over, but I feel obliged to tell you this is fairly old stuff - the article talks about what later became known as JIT, which did improve Java performance a lot (and later influenced modern JavaScript engines), but never quite rose to the super-fast levels promised and hoped.
__________________
Blogging about mobile linux - The Penguin Moves!
Maintainer of PyQt (see introduction and docs), AppWatch, QuickBrownFox, etc