Is this based on law, or just an opinion? I can't believe that any legal system in any civilized part of the world would convict a person for flipping the switch in the above scenario. By this measure, if a truck pushes me off the road and I'm heading 100 KPH into a group of children I shouldn't swerve to avoid them because heaven forbid I hit one adult in my way. If I hit the kids, the bus driver killed them. If I swerve, *I* killed the adult. That makes no sense to me whatsoever. As a driver, it is my responsibility to minimize the damage I do in ANY circumstance, regardless of fault. Au contraire, if I was heading for children and there were no skid marks I'd be facing some very uncomfortable questions. This is now officially off topic, since we moved from moral to legal. (I'm listening to the MP3 tomorrow, it's very, very late here)