View Single Post
Posts: 1,086 | Thanked: 2,964 times | Joined on Jan 2010
#44
Originally Posted by gerbick View Post
This whole "walled garden" hatred has honestly produced nothing when all of this freedom has been given on the N900. Absolutely nothing so far. An odd upgrade path that's not fully laid out by corporate (yet), a total lack of apps that improve upon functionality, developers waiting to hear if their apps will be ok in the next iteration fully, already installed apps not updated, et al..
The "walled garden", through it's closedness perhaps inadvertently, provides direction, cohesion, and leadership. There's a path to follow. It makes it simpler for the vendor to provide things, like a commercial app store, because it knows the type of apps that will be supplied through it. Documentation and apis can be developed knowing there are only a subset of languages that will be used, books start appearing on Amazon as the target audience is much more defined. End users aren't bothered how the app was written or if it was deved on locked down iphone sdk on a required Mac or open source Eclipse, only what that app does for them. This open sourced experiment of the n900 seems to offer plenty of potential but along with that are more complexities, fragmentation, and very little leadership from Nokia. And that's reflected in application development and customer base.