View Single Post
Posts: 840 | Thanked: 823 times | Joined on Nov 2009
#274
Originally Posted by slender View Post
I Agree most part of your message but to this i have to say: - They were first - That was 2 years ago (WTF Nokia) -> who ever comes after has no time to mature itself. You must hit hard and fast. Otherwise there is no reason to be first.
I agree, they should have hit harder and faster perhaps by having more faith in maemo as a smartphone and funding and hiring to implement the missing phone features. I do think they were caught off guard with the reception to maemo 5, symbian was their main platform until maemo showed that it can compete in the (smart)phone market too.