View Single Post
MohammadAG's Avatar
Posts: 2,473 | Thanked: 12,265 times | Joined on Oct 2009 @ Jerusalem, PS/IL
#13
Originally Posted by baron von bubba View Post
explain further please?
what are you basing this claim on?
A Nokia engineer who knows way more than you do, or any other user who states overclocking is safe.

Originally Posted by baron von bubba View Post
afak many ppl are now clocking the device, some to stooopid levels, i know it's yet early days but are you not a little surprised even at these silly 850+ levels there have been no failures?
Anything above 600 is stupid, otherwise TI would've stated that, and obviously, since TI made these chips they know what they're talking about.

Originally Posted by baron von bubba View Post
locking the processor @ 600...... so not good even at default settings to use the device for long periods with the processor maxed out??
so where do you draw the line? don't use the device at all for fear of shortening its life span somewhat??
No, the device doesn't stay at 600 all the time, when it's under load, it maxes out, when it finishes doing something, it goes back to 250 (125 wasn't set as a minimum since it doesn't really help with battery power and actually causes the device to become unstable).

Originally Posted by baron von bubba View Post
i know my phone battery when idling is now stupidly loooong lasting, on default is was terrible....so more power was being used @ default idle, would this not be worse for the device also?
125, as I said above, wasn't disabled because Nokia want to make your battery last less, it was done for a reason.

Undervolting doesn't help in not frying the device.
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to MohammadAG For This Useful Post: