View Single Post
Posts: 1,341 | Thanked: 708 times | Joined on Feb 2010
#47
Originally Posted by tso View Post
and nokia was (is?) probably worried that they did not have any phones that could decode ogg in hardware.
This was Nokia's opinion about HTML5 video-tag:
http://www.w3.org/2007/08/video/positions/Nokia.pdf
(PDF, another evil thing from Adobe)
Anything beyond that, including a W3C-lead standardization of a “free” codec, or the active endorsement of proprietary technology such as Ogg, ..., by W3C, is, in our opinion, not helpful for the co-existence of the two ecosystems (web and video), and
therefore not our choice.
.....
While not competitive with today’s state of the art codecs,
it’s in the author’s personal experience not that far in its performance from
Ogg Theora (this technology is what the current HTML5 draft suggests for the same purpose).
I think it would had been good if Theora would had been mandatory codec in HTML5-compliant www-borwsers, but not the only possibility as it is today.
Now all www-browsers should support H.264, Theora and Flash Video to have "full featured web experience".

Last edited by zimon; 2010-04-29 at 19:22.