View Single Post
Posts: 67 | Thanked: 280 times | Joined on Dec 2009
#14
Originally Posted by jaysire View Post
Exactly how is the N900 multitasking so much better than what the Android has?
Well, on Android, applications are suspended when they are no longer visible to the user. They are still in the memory, but that's it, no event handling, no calculations, nothing (and don't confuse this with stuff like "your music still running in the background", it doesn't actually come from the "real" app, but from a service running - its like a micro app without UI running without you knowing). And if the system needs additional memory, the app you use the least has its state saved and then shut down to free up memory. To the user though, those apps still appear to be in the background, while, in fact, they are not. When they are brought to the foreground, they are actually restarted and their saved state is restored.

On N900 - apps run in the background fully. No suspended or saved states, they run like on your desktop. And you decide when to shut them down. Great and multitasking optimized Maemo, swap file and the power of N900 hardware make this possible without loosing performance greatly.

So, basically, you have an illusion of multitasking on Android vs the real multitasking on N900.


Originally Posted by cryox92 View Post
A great post mate . But some of your points are arguable. MeeGo on the n900 hasnt been confirmed so you cant be quite sure about being able to choose between 2 OS`s.
True, but that doesn't mean we shouldn't expect it. Let's just say that, while you can say I just made an educated guess, I'm pretty sure we'll have MeeGo on the N900 (reference platform for MeeGo, Nokia employees giving strong hints, and - lastly - no real reason not to have it, but many reasons not to announce it officially yet)

But, even without MeeGo, I still stand behind what I said

Last edited by ivanzorkic; 2010-04-29 at 23:07.
 

The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to ivanzorkic For This Useful Post: