Someone implied that some criticism has been less than fully informed.
The point was made that the community wasn't very involved in the development of Mer and thus shares some responsibility for its failure. Probably so, but I don't think that a good job of momentum-building was done. I remember personally expressing skepticism at whether it was necessary to stop everything and wait for the two drivers. There were other delays that seemed mysterious to me. Once it became clear how great Mer's potential was, there must have been greater and greater willingness to help out.
The point was made that the community wasn't very involved in the development of Mer and thus shares some responsibility for its failure.
I don't see why Nokia would cry when tablet owners were essentially smothered by those with other preoccupations about the N900 or MeeGo. The renaming of ITT was not just some isolated decison and neither was the foundering of Mer. They were all part of a reallignment of power in favor of the one who was paying the bills.
That was not your fault; maybe it was inevitable as soon as the true interests of those with internet tablets acquired second-class status.