Thread
:
A PR1.2 by any other country.
View Single Post
KapCaveman
2010-05-02 , 22:48
Posts: 37 | Thanked: 31 times | Joined on Apr 2010
#
9
Could you point me in the direction of the N900 leaked firmware releases from other locations that had a different reception?
Could you point out to me the posts that have talked about the(possible) chinese origin of the release being the reason for mistrust.
Could you tell the people that have had problems how they should keep quiet about them so as not to draw inferences on the (possible) chinese origin of those problems?
Could you explain why the country it was leaked from would have any bearing on whether unreleased, unknown origin, unknown function, unknown purpose, unknown reliability firmware where it's not known what functionality is available, the state of that functionality the future upgrade path of that firmware, the product codes that it is expected to work with, the languages it works with and whether someone might have tampered with any of the code should be considered safe to use?
If you were concerned that the country of origin of a piece of software might influence your decision to trust a particular piece of leaked code would you consider that those states that censor information flow and are known to make attacks on the corporate infrastructure of large organisations might be particularly suspect?
Speaking for myself I am still tempted to try it, has anyone confirmed whether Madde Integration with the beta Qt SDK works?
Quote & Reply
|
KapCaveman
View Public Profile
Send a private message to KapCaveman
Find all posts by KapCaveman