Thread: [Closed - Leaked PR1.2] Info and Discussion thread
View Single Post
fatalsaint is offline fatalsaint
2010-05-03 , 15:57
Posts: 3,428 | Thanked: 2,856 times | Joined on Jul 2008
#529
Originally Posted by egoshin View Post
To create a debian file which HAS a reprogrammed cell/3G chip to some new firmware the author at least needs access to Nokia internal documentation and code. To fix a lot of bugs which are still listed in bugzilla the author should be a genius.

Taking that into account - a leaked PR1.2 is definitely a Nokia product.
True, but all one needs to be is an employee of Nokia and have malicious intentions to take one of PR1.2 builds, modify it, and then "leak" it.

For example: The build is over a month old right? What do you think he could have been doing to it in that month? .

I mean honestly.. if you're a Nokia employee and you want to "get back" at the company, or "support open source!", or whatever misguided ideological philosophy this guy was operating under - wouldn't you release the latest build? Why a month old one?
__________________
If I've helped you or you use any of my packages feel free to help me out.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Maintaining:
pyRadio - Pandora Radio on your N900, N810 or N800!
 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to fatalsaint For This Useful Post: