simple question: how would nokia justify to take money for fixing issues introduced deliberately, by bad design, or just bugs -- for a device one already paid big money for?

missing ussd was amazing ignorance (w/o it one can neither request account information in a great many networks nor change the pin).
gps not working well without inet connection as well, caused by a totally unjustified idea of the prospective user ("we never thought, anybody using this phone will _not_ have a flatrate for inte connections").
not being able to dial certain numbers as pointed out in the bugreport is simply bad design or caused by a defunct qa department.

surfing the forum alone produces a plethora of issues not present in considerably cheaper smartphones, because their producers apparently take greater pains to ensure usability, stabilty, and bug fixing.

if nokia actually would start taking money for fixing self-induced shortcomings of a very expensive device, the would be dead.