the dns service is thankfully optional, and the http replacement (more like a improvement, iirc) do not show any signs of EEE (like what microsoft have a history of doing) but i am not fully aware of any license put on the improvements, if any at all.

i guess they are evil tho, if evil includes disregarding potential negatives to their own actions. The road to hell is paved with good intentions?

so far the only section of google that shows any direct willingness to control things is the android one, and its a transplant rather then a in house creation. The rest just seems to create services and such without maybe considering any negative effects it can have down the road. Heck, when complaints where made about issues of data being held hostage by google servers, they provided tools for getting the data out.