View Single Post
Posts: 992 | Thanked: 995 times | Joined on Dec 2009 @ California
#28
Originally Posted by Venemo View Post
You misunderstand.

Google put some sh*t into the Linux kernel which break compatibility between Android's drivers and "regular" Linux drivers. Along with other stuff.

The kernel maintainers asked Google to fix it. Google didn't care. (This is why they are evil.)
I am not fanatic of Google and I am a linux s/w developer but I think you misunderstand a little in the last sentence -

The Linux community way of maintaining kernel is not very compatible with commercial production. It is pretty troublesome to keep development of commercial product without a reliable way to make your patches working. You do a patch/development and put it in kernel. Later that patch is considered bad - but nobody consult with you about mainstream development and make agreement what to do and you should spend money for fixing things which are working. But you are bound with contracts, obligations and schedules and spending money on commercial product development.

Moreover, you do a patch but there is no a reliable way that your patch will be included in any form (even adjusted) in mainstream build... Would you like to establish a solid commercial plan on this shaky ground?