View Single Post
Posts: 3,319 | Thanked: 5,610 times | Joined on Aug 2008 @ Finland
#57
Originally Posted by ndi View Post
b) None of those are X86. It's easy to lock down a proprietary hardware with a proprietary OS. It's virtually impossible to do so with X86 lest you risk platform incompatibility.
This is completely bogus. Intel (like all major chipmakers) has a very serious investment in 'trusted/secure computing', has even worked with ARM on TrustZone in the XScale days, and is shipping with a lot of security enabled chipsets for years. The fact that this tech has not yet been widely used for lockdown is most certainly not the result of Intel fighting tooth and nail for your hack-rights.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trusted...ion_Technology
__________________
Blogging about mobile linux - The Penguin Moves!
Maintainer of PyQt (see introduction and docs), AppWatch, QuickBrownFox, etc
 

The Following User Says Thank You to attila77 For This Useful Post: