View Single Post
Posts: 87 | Thanked: 277 times | Joined on Feb 2010 @ Helsinki, Finland
#13
Originally Posted by lostinmirkwood View Post
One other thing,
I assume that this test was run on a consistent WiFi network,
and that each candidate test was carried out temporally close to one another.

Because it still seems odd, that the browser benchmark would show MicroB 35% faster; but average real world tests shows around 65-72% of the performance of other browsers.
Test was run in a fast WiFi network in a short time period. Each test was run twice and there was not big differences between the runs (<1 second).

Order:
MicroB, first run
Fennec, first run
Opera, first run
MicroB, second run
Fennec, second run
Opera, second run