View Single Post
cjp's Avatar
Posts: 762 | Thanked: 395 times | Joined on Jan 2010 @ Helsinki
#22
Originally Posted by ysss View Post
Going back to topic, I don't think the number of features are always directly proportional to the number of bugs.

Ergo, it's not less bugs vs more features.
My thoughts exactly.

Posts like these usually strike me as having an attitude that "perhaps if we show what we think here, it will become a reality", as the OP was quick to (rightfully) call on Nokia on this pattern.

I don't think that this kind of logic (features vs bugs) exists anywhere inside Nokia. The bugs we see in Nokia's products aren't necessarily caused by the features and there's a larger explanation for why we must encounter bugs time after time in new products. I believe this "bigger picture" to be Nokia's tendency to release new devices and services faster than what they can truly manage.

With this view in mind, simply thinking that Nokia prefers "quantity" over "quality" in their products isn't true. I'd guess they prefer quantity in regards to number of models against perfecting only a few models.

However, sharing the viewed idealism of the OP, I would like to see Nokia release products with no bugs and therefore I've voted accordingly. We all know they already have enough features in their phones (as nothing's been added since the N95!).

Last edited by cjp; 2010-05-16 at 09:07.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to cjp For This Useful Post: