View Single Post
Posts: 344 | Thanked: 73 times | Joined on Jan 2010
#29
Originally Posted by fatalsaint View Post
So, you're [sic ] entire response seems to be directed to the wrong person.

I think you're confusing names .
Oh my, you are correct, sir or madam. How embarrasing. I guess it's due to the fact that YoDude was so adamantly confrontational and defensive in regard to my "agitprop" remark, that I simply assumed he was the OP, and then unconsciously ignored even the very names I was using as quotes in my own posts! How remarkable a thing the human mind is, wouldn't you agree?

So the only question left to ask is, Why was YoDude so adamantly defensive regarding my "agitprop" remark? His was response #15, and mine was response #19. I would have assumed that by not quoting the OP, it was understood that I was replying to the thread's main intent, and not responding to anyone's response in particular.

It is indeed odd that YoDude chose my comment to focus on as a potential reply to his own response - I can se no clear reason for that.

Oh well, I admit being confused, but only by someone who is themself confused. I promise I will try and do better next time. And thank you, fatalsaint, for calling my attention to my error.

...so Uwe, all that bit about agitprop and stealth marketing and loaded language, that was for your benefit. Enjoy, then, I hope you read up on it!
__________________
N900.... thick like computer

Last edited by oldpmaguy; 2010-05-16 at 18:46.