View Single Post
Posts: 874 | Thanked: 316 times | Joined on Jun 2007 @ London UK
#82
Yes I think that's true. Or if they were to sell something like a flagship model as experimental, at least they should come out and officially say we will later apply what we learnt unto this experiment with official firmware.
Yes and price it accordingly, i.e. low. It is not fair to price it as a premium product when it doesn't perform as such and leaves us high and dry shortly afterwards. That way we know where we stand and it avoids bad feeling.

I mean it doesn't even help the majority when fanboys come out and say "You should've done your research!!!!!".
They would of course have been correct in that and I walked into the SmartQ purchase with my eyes open so the lack of optimisation efforts over the past year are disappointing but that was on the cards from the outset and it was cheap too.

Nokia charged full price for the N800 and that implied much more. Not only the cost but the kudos I had wrongly attributed to the Nokia brand. And that really is at the heart of this. I simply gave Nokia more credit for customer care than it warranted. That might go some way to explaining why Apple is wiping the floor with Nokia.

@Rebski I've developed my own smartphone/tablet/netbook/home console OS concept and I've nearly finalized about 50% of the illustrations. Once I've finished 50% (soon), you will be one of the first to get a sneak peek, I'll PM you. [Constructive] Criticism is much appreciated
Thank you I look forward to that.