View Single Post
Posts: 1,425 | Thanked: 983 times | Joined on May 2010 @ Hong Kong
#202
Originally Posted by ysss View Post
One dimensional metrics are generally true for hobbyist with simpler usage patters. Case in point, PC gamers/modders. When you try to make decisions for a more complex problems (ie: choosing a handheld device to use for 20,000 mobile workers in 15 countries) then 'the best device' won't be measured with as simple metrics as the previous example.
That's what make iPhone, which is successfully targeting the majority. I don't have a problem with that. So your point is...

Will you accept an iPhone fanboy citing (Apple's design decision of) not having a hardware keyboard when they fall behind in typing speed? Let's not pick and choose as you deem convenient. These products all have compromises, none of them are universally perfect.
I see your argument, you thought I meant in my words "Nokia compromises on nothing". Nokia is not God, they must compromise on a lot of things. We should not waste time on obvious.

My question "Why should Nokia compromises?" refers to the issues of our discussion, not everything. Should I detail in every sentence to explain the obvious? I hope not.

I also think that you will have to eat your own words when this deficiency is fixed in the future (unofficial MeeGo for N900, maybe).
Which word should I eat? Did I say anything that sounds like 'N900 has fully utilized its hardware to maximum usability experience'? I just said you made an unfair comparison with iPhone.

Last edited by 9000; 2010-05-29 at 14:10.