View Single Post
ysss's Avatar
Posts: 4,384 | Thanked: 5,524 times | Joined on Jul 2007 @ ˙ǝɹǝɥʍou
#83
Originally Posted by Rebski View Post
Yes and price it accordingly, i.e. low. It is not fair to price it as a premium product when it doesn't perform as such and leaves us high and dry shortly afterwards. That way we know where we stand and it avoids bad feeling.
[/QUOTE]

I think this underlines one of the basic issues in this market segment. On a smartphone spec page, generally the hardware components take up some 80-95% of the listing. Sometimes the software component only shows up in one line:

Operating System: ____

So it would be par for the course for Nokia to price the N900 as it is, due to the hardware specs on it. The software component (OS, core apps, etc) value on the N900 depends highly on who's judging it.
__________________
Class .. : Power User
Humor .. : [#####-----] | Alignment: Pragmatist
Patience : [###-------] | Weapon(s): Galaxy Note + BB Bold Touch 9900
Agro ... : [###-------] | Relic(s) : iPhone 4S, Atrix, Milestone, N900, N800, N95, HTC G1, Treos, Zauri, BB 9000, BB 9700, etc

Follow the MeeGo Coding Competition!