View Single Post
Posts: 402 | Thanked: 229 times | Joined on Nov 2009 @ Missouri, USA
#26
Originally Posted by aspidites View Post
Are you implying then that *.doc is an exclusive format to write reports, papers, etc; that excel is an exclusive format to write spreadsheets?
Originally Posted by gerbick View Post
I didn't say that, now did I?
No, what you did say was:

Originally Posted by gerbick View Post
Safari is not an exclusive manner to get to the web. Each OS has their own default method to get to the internet.
Notice the use of the interrogotive words "are you". It was a question, not a quote.

Originally Posted by aspidites View Post

"Reasonable" was a bad choice of words here. It seems to imply that a person that doesn't know that Windows can't handle ext3 by default is unreasonable. The point of mentioning ext3 partion format is that every modern operating system that I have come across can read ext3 by default EXCEPT for Windows.

Either way, it shouldn't be expected for a non-windows computer to be able to open Windows proprietary formats -- can stock Mac OS 10 open excel spreadsheets, yet? Why should a Linux computer be expected to?

No computer I have purchased (either through newegg, circuit city, or best buy) has come with an excel reader preinstalled without paying a premium. It has been a couple of years though, so perhaps this has changed.

The original complaint was that these things weren't built-in, so the mention of installable applications to fill this void is unneccessary.

No need for corrections, lest everything that was ever said on the internet need be historically accurate.
Originally Posted by gerbick View Post
Earlier you said:



That's what I was addressing.



I didn't say that, now did I? I said that *.doc was not proprietary Windows - thus Microsoft - formats. It belonged to WordPerfect.

The rest... you've assumed way too much unfortunately.
Funny how you neglected to highlight the word linux in my quote.

This is "the rest". I fail to see what is "assumed" here. your concern over the original proprieters of a particular format seem rather pedantic, given the context at which the original argument was given -- that is, that it whether it was word perfect, microsoft, or anyone else's format originally is irrelevant.

Anyways, back on topic: I would say geneven raises a good point, except that I can't think of any other mobile device that has had more than one version of flash. My archos 5 only had one version AFAICT. Had it not been for the demo video where 10.1 was seen to work on the N900, I myself wouldn't have expected an update at all.
__________________
aspidites | blog | aspidites@inbox.com