View Single Post
danramos's Avatar
Posts: 4,672 | Thanked: 5,455 times | Joined on Jul 2008 @ Springfield, MA, USA
#66
Originally Posted by woof404 View Post
Just because Nokia "gives you" the source code doesn't make it a "effort" towards free software. If Nokia, however, license it under a free software license so everyone can use, copy, modify and distribute then we can get on starting. Company's now seem to hide behind the shell that is "open source". Everyone can open source something and stuff it with a license that doesn't allow you to do a damn thing, if you have guts you license it as real free software.
Well, there is that too--but I don't think that's relevant here. The problem isn't that it's a ridiculous form of open-source, it's that, for almost the entire life of these products, there's a large portion of GPLv2 open-source code being held captive by some few, but critical, completely closed-source drivers and other programs you're forced to have as part of a system image. More and more of it became open-sourced, but I've got a feeling it has less to do with Nokia and more to do with the component manufacturers themselves providing the openness more and more. A lot of simple Nokia-made software on the tablets (like that god-awful media player) remained closed all while drivers were opening.

Originally Posted by Crogge View Post
I think Maemo 5 is way more stable then the first versions of this fresh "MeeGo" stuff. So what is so bad with Maemo 5? Why do you talk about a OS which is optimised for Netbooks at the moment?
Of course Maemo 5 is more stable on your tablet--it was made for it and it's the FIFTH iteration to work on this similar OMAP architecture. Meego is only JUST having its first go (hah... get it, meego) at running on OMAP like this. The intention, if I understand it right, is to migrate to a distribution that will last longer-term. Maybe even possibly carrying Nokia's good-will and influence on to other hardware as well, by taking credit for getting a community around this new OS. If the latter is right, I might feel better about Nokia's position on this--since it'll be less about NOKIA locking you in to their product with closed drivers and software and more about the liberated operating system. THAT might change a lot of my cynicism in their brand right now. We'll see.

Originally Posted by pantera1989 View Post
Yeah I guess so. I am not defending Nokia. I was merely asking if someone did try sending them a letter.
Naw, it was already spelled out for you in the license. Especially the parts that point out that the Linux kernel itself is GPLv2 and portions of the OS image fall under other licenses and may not be openly available.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to danramos For This Useful Post: