View Single Post
Flandry's Avatar
Posts: 1,559 | Thanked: 1,786 times | Joined on Oct 2009 @ Boston
#45
Originally Posted by slipkornsaad View Post
Take a look at my face to face :

N86 vs N82 vs N900

http://www.planete-nokia.com/phpBB2/...howtopic=59420

N900 vs Omnia HD vs N95 8GB vs 5800XM !

http://www.planete-nokia.com/phpBB2/...howtopic=58867
Courtesy of babelfish:
"J' updated the first post with new photographs, my short opinion (without technical comments) on the 3: - N82, is always with the signal after a long time of its exit, unbeatable flash, management of l' correct exposure, but lack of clearness (can be corrected by adjustments), closer colorimetry with reality, captures subjects moving without complications! - N900, c' is l' one of the 3 which surprises me more, clear photographs, colorimetry more " plaisante" to see (lives), but the double led is too weak and has evil under the conditions with weak luminosity. - N86? Flaghship of the Nokia photophones? Can be on paper, not actually… finally… l' experiment user is poor: opening of the release --> it is necessary to have patience more than 3 seconds to have l' object on the sight!"

LOL @ "double LED has evil under the conditions with weak luminosity." Couldn't have said it better myself...

I'd say looking through those that the N900 is tied for the lead except whenever the evil flash comes on.
__________________

Unofficial PR1.3/Meego 1.1 FAQ

***
Classic example of arbitrary Nokia decision making. Couldn't just fallback to the no brainer of tagging with lat/lon if network isn't accessible, could you Nokia?
MAME: an arcade in your pocket
Accelemymote: make your accelerometer more joy-ful