View Single Post
Guest | Posts: n/a | Thanked: 0 times | Joined on
#125
Originally Posted by benny1967
instead of keeping up this pointless discussion, why don't you link to those sales numbers? them being available means there's a source of information about nokia i missed so far. (i googled before i wrote my last post about not knowing these numbers.)
To which I answered, listed. Then I asked for the same.

You've not delivered. You called it pointless, I proved my stance.

Do the same. Call me rude all you wish. But if I can answer, prove and then ask and then request the same level of proof and that's considered rude, then don't ask.

You've delineated any discussion and now you've personalized it to a point where it will forever be pointless for you to continue because you fail to see one simple goshdarn thing.

Prove what you're saying. I did. A retraction from Engadget - which, all of a sudden is credible by you people, but not normally since it's much maligned since it's supposedly an "American blog" - then which is it?

The magic number you've decided to believe in support your stance. I ask for proof, you cannot deliver. Now you want to make it all about being rude? You're definitely not one to talk - you've had to explain quite a few times why you're seen as rude.

I'm just asking for proof. You asked for it, I gave it to you.

Do me the courtesy of doing the same; or acknowledge that you cannot do the same via official Nokia links like I have.

That's all there is to it.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to For This Useful Post: