View Single Post
Texrat's Avatar
Posts: 11,700 | Thanked: 10,045 times | Joined on Jun 2006 @ North Texas, USA
#81
Originally Posted by fatalsaint View Post
I think the point is that while you were a contributing factor you are not the sole focus of his disagreement.

You aren't the only moderator that does the things you do (at least, I don't think so). So yes, he COULD have PM'd you specifically about YOUR thread you closed: but I'm sure PB had several threads in mind when he posted, yours just being the last one (most recent) that happened.

So while he could have gotten clarification on yours specifically, that wasn't really what he was after.. (if I'm reading him correctly.)
Understood, but the fact is I did close the thread that triggered this one, and my final comments were addressed-- at first obliquely and then specifically. Couple that with the fact that I have closed several threads of that nature lately and there was really no way of divorcing me from the actions.

I got my hackles up mainly because I saw a defense of rank behavior at the root of the protests. Maybe that was the wrong aspect on which to focus. It's just that's where I'm coming from vis-a-vis the subject.

I'm just stymied on identifying a common complaint and then moving to a majority-agreed solution that doesn't negatively impact a rational minority. I don't even think it's possible-- which again is why my approach will default to the will of the general community. And the only complaint I get from the rank and file is that moderation is not hEAVY enough...
__________________
Nokia Developer Champion
Different <> Wrong | Listen - Judgment = Progress | People + Trust = Success
My personal site: http://texrat.net
 

The Following User Says Thank You to Texrat For This Useful Post: