View Single Post
Posts: 1,751 | Thanked: 844 times | Joined on Feb 2010 @ Sweden
#93
Originally Posted by bugelrex View Post
The only reason to be happy with it is that Nokia might *finally* start to notice they are on the wrong path and correct it. Start with dumping the CEO

They need to realize its not 2005 anymore, the competition has caught and Nokia needs to lead. Currently their high end products can barely compete (for the majority of consumers)
*currently* Consumers like:
- ease of use, not 5 layers of menus to do one thing
- stable OS and out of the box apps
- touch screen
- slim phone
- great battery life
- decent maps,music,video,facebook apps designed for touch screen
- decent front and back camera.

Name one Nokia phone on the market that meets these requirements
The n900 got better battery life than the Nexus and 3Gs too i think. Camera is better than most of the competitors. Resisitive are far better on a smartphone than capacitive (in my mind). The OS are stable and have a longer learning curve than the others.. but are more powerful.

The only lack the n900 have is a slim and flashy outer body. (Though i wouldn't mind if it was little bigger.. 4" screen would be nice.)

Last edited by AlMehdi; 2010-06-17 at 09:49.