@ysss: I don't think you're getting what I'm trying to say. I'm not against the new policy at all, I just think that it should be reduced to those rules that actually help getting rid of trolls.

Instead there's a whole lot of rules that don't make sense and will most probably lead to problems later on, because it's not trolls that will be breaking those rules but most probably rather viable members.

And once again: I've never run into a signature that was longer than the post it accompanied, simply because most people who have long signatures won't post 1-sentence-turbo-replies. I haven't seen a single harmful signature so far, but I HAVE seen long signatures that had a lot of value in them.

But, whatever, just stating my concerns. I myself couldn't care less - if I get banned in a couple of months because an overzealous moderator thinks I'm Satan himself for bringing back a thread from the void of the second page, may it be. There's other communities that I can develop for and other people that may answer questions once I'm banned.