@Nathraiben:
Ok, I can understand that concern.

Personally, I tend to trust the people behind the rules. They've done a great job so far and I've seen instances where negative exchange go longer than necessary due to (non existent\unclear?) policy regarding 'soft' spamming/trolling; It seems that they just need a clear written policy as a base to act.

I really doubt they'll start to waste their time to conduct witch hunts for people with >5 lines sigs, for example. Just when it's spotted in a thread where overpopulated by sigs than content, then people can be reminded of the written rule...

They know that developers are the real actors in this show.. moderators are the security (and uhm, ushers ).

Let's just wait and see.. and wish them well