View Single Post
Flandry's Avatar
Posts: 1,559 | Thanked: 1,786 times | Joined on Oct 2009 @ Boston
#198
Originally Posted by chemist View Post
Ah ok I overlooked that sry, thought its some kind of automatic (thats what IPB for example has as default).
It may be automated; what i meant was that, when giving out infractions, a moderator will see what infractions exist and will know what the total points will be. Unless it's desirable to have the user permanently banned, he can then decide to not give multiple infractions such that the total results in a permban.

This

to
and putting this elsewhere
Well i hijacked Reggie's section, which was specifically on not attacking the mods, to make it refer to everyone. There's actually language earlier in the text that requests that all be treated with respect and not attacked. I think his original intent for the section was to point out specifically that attacking mods is also covered by the "no personal attacks" and "treat others with respect" instructions, so i don't think the changes are desirable. It's intended to specify admins/mods in that section.

And this is not coming clear as in "not clear where this takes action"
I moved that sentence and reworded it. It now reads like this:

Infraction points will be given for misbehavior in public forum communications as well as for attacking other members in other ways (PM, Email Member Feature, Social Groups, Gallery, etc.), if it is reported. The following are the assigned infraction points for specific violations:
__________________

Unofficial PR1.3/Meego 1.1 FAQ

***
Classic example of arbitrary Nokia decision making. Couldn't just fallback to the no brainer of tagging with lat/lon if network isn't accessible, could you Nokia?
MAME: an arcade in your pocket
Accelemymote: make your accelerometer more joy-ful