Thread: iPhone 4
View Single Post
woody14619's Avatar
Posts: 1,455 | Thanked: 3,309 times | Joined on Dec 2009 @ Rochester, NY
#613
Originally Posted by ysss View Post
@Cobra: because the same image definition spread across more pixels means more bits but no more data... = less efficiency.
Originally Posted by sondjata View Post
The problem is that if the sensor capturing these images are the same size, then there is more noise introduced. That's why the high end digital cameras have larger CCD's to go along with the high pixel counts.
You're both right, and at the same time wrong. The important ingredient you're both omitting is the optics. You can have all the MP you want, but if you've got a crap lens, it won't matter, as ysss notes. Optics can only get so small and still be effective. You can help offset that with a larger capture area, but even that has limits. There's a reason you see monster lens systems on professional cameras. You need that space to bend the light properly, given the materials available.

If they've increased sensor size, and properly fitted a decent optical system over it, a 12MP sensor can in fact be a great improvement. But there are limits to what you can do and still compact it all into a phone-sized device. Once you've crossed a certain limit (and 12MP is a hair past that IMHO) then any MP gains are lost to fuzz.

Trust me on this. I work with camera sensors that are over 30MP and lenses in the X00mm plus range daily... If there's one thing I know, it's image quality, and the optics are a key part in any imaging device. That was one of the reasons I liked the N900. Not that it's lens system is the end-all be-all, but they're at least attempting to use the sensor to it's fullest. If you have a fixed lens, don't bother going over 3MP.
 

The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to woody14619 For This Useful Post: