This is true of any site and any moderators, if The Savior himself would be super-mod. In fact, should that happen, I'm outta here, I'm not about to debate anything with a person that advocates angels.

(later edit: I dribble away here, the rest of the post is not aimed at you)

Well, that aside, what I like about this new system is that it allows for lighter touch. IMO, having a gradient soaks a lot of error on mod's part, since I no longer am on a ban-or-allow mode, thus I'm able to soak off a bad call via a warning that expires with no lasting effect (right?). It should at least ensure that only people who overdo something get anything tangible in return.

Whether or not one's right in his/her point of view is less than important. After all, should one mod disagree and warn you over a post, you can just let it go. You did post your opinion, people saw, that's the target right there. If one's target is to repeat the point 50 times, does it matter if he/she' right?

From what rules I saw, nothing bad, final comes for posting an opinion, regardless of what it is and how you put it.

Actually, you can post an advertisement (10) of (and with) inappropriate materials (10), by using inappropriate language(5) and still be under the 1-day ban.

Hmm. You can cross-post (5) illegal materials (20) and still be a day off.

Hmmmmm. I can personally atack someone (20) using illegal materials (10) by photoshopping one's head on something that belongs in /b/, then use it as my avatar (5), my signature (5), and cross-post (5) it just before my week off?

Rili?

I demand this oppression be immediately reviewed. (help, help, I'm being repressed!)