View Single Post
Posts: 3,401 | Thanked: 1,255 times | Joined on Nov 2005 @ London, UK
#8
Originally Posted by iball View Post
But the 110 is priced pretty much PERFECTLY and the 210 looks slick.
The only difference between them - other than price - seems to be that the 210 has BT and MMC capabilities whereas the 110 only has the wi-fi and SD capabilities.
According to this specification page on the HP site, the 110 has 11 b/g WiFi and BT 2.0 + EDR just like the 210.

However the 210 is very different to the 110 - sloppy work on the part of the Register for suggesting they're very similar! The 210 (specs) has a 480x640 resolution 4" touch screen, 128MB RAM (64MB in the 110), capacious 2200mAh battery (1200mAh in 110, 1500mAh in N800) and supports full size SD card (inc. MMC support - the 110 supports only microSD) and also CF II support.

Basically, the 210 sounds like a direct replacement for the iPaq HX4700.