But who do you blame for that? Nokia or keep pointing the finger to the market they've not advertised in for... ages?

I can remember wanting the 7160. I had to go from Charleston, SC to Cincinnati, Ohio to find one. That's 641 miles (~1031km) for a mediocre phone that was highly touted for its reception. Which... was 100% true - I lived in an area that was notorious for poor reception. Also was on the road a lot. It did what I needed, 100%. It replaced my 8890, which replaced my 8860.

But I've not been compelled since the Nokia N93i to really look at their phones. I don't know which ones are out that's worth a damn in the US. It's not their sole N-series that came to AT&T... it didn't even have wifi when the rest of the N-series did at that time.

So... yeah. Who do you blame? Let's be realistic.