Thread
:
Community input for new t.m.o. policy
View Single Post
Flandry
2010-07-10 , 18:24
Posts: 1,559 | Thanked: 1,786 times | Joined on Oct 2009 @ Boston
#
242
There are two different opinions on this issue, and i made the change due to the impression that some are in favor of scrupulously not making this part of the policy statement (i.e. just a friendly reminder that t.m.o. is not a Nokia forum), while you are suggesting we do in fact make it part of the policy. I was happy with the way it was originally: somewhere between, leaving it to the discretion of moderators as it is in fact anyway and should be for such threads. There are perfectly good examples of both kinds of posts around if we need exhibits. Adding something that sounds like a rule is going to be misinterpreted, i think.
__________________
Unofficial PR1.3/Meego 1.1 FAQ
***
Classic example of arbitrary Nokia decision making.
Couldn't just fallback to the no brainer of tagging with lat/lon if network isn't accessible, could you Nokia?
MAME
: an arcade in your pocket
Accelemymote
: make your accelerometer more joy-ful
Quote & Reply
|
Flandry
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Flandry
Find all posts by Flandry