View Single Post
Posts: 540 | Thanked: 288 times | Joined on Sep 2009
#463
Originally Posted by titan View Post
In the future we probably need a separate fcam-drivers-package (but AFAIK HAM is not sophisticated enough to handle such dependencies and conflicts) or we would need to add modules for both kernel versions to the fcam-drivers package.
A bit late here, but would'nt it work in the following way:

fcam (and other frontend programs) "Require: fcam-drivers", then have fcam-drivers package for stock-kernel that requires exact stock-kernel version (just to be sure), and have fcam-drivers-power that "Provides: fcam-drivers" (and naturally requires kernel-power itself). alternatively the fcam drivers can be incorporated in the kernel-power-modules package (it makes the build script slightly more complex) and add another Provides entry there.

I'm fairly sure HAM can resolve any dependency issue that apt-get can.
__________________
  • Live near Helsinki, Finland & interested in electronics ? Check this out.
  • Want anti-virus/firewall ? Read this (and follow the links, also: use the search, there are way too many threads asking the same questions over and over and over again).
  • I'm experimenting with BitCoins, if you want to tip me send some to: 1CAEy7PYptSasN67TiMYM74ELDVGZS6cCB