Thread
:
Many tested apps in Extras-testing are not promoted timely
View Single Post
v13
2010-08-01 , 16:42
Posts: 376 | Thanked: 511 times | Joined on Aug 2009 @ Greece
#
11
There are other problems too: See the packege "maegirls". The version in testing has a bug fix and portrait mode support but it cannot be promoted yet. This prevents us from uploading versions with minor changes since they take forever to be uploaded. For example, the last version of maegirls has a typo in its description but I'm not going to fix this and loose the 6 votes it collected in 2 months.
Once again, IMHO, the 10 votes requirement is not a good thing. It makes the process a popularity contest instead of a QA process. It also somehow discourages authors and testers. Again, I've not seen any argument in favour of 10 instead (e.g) of 5 or 20.
Also, testing serves as an intermediate repository for packages that work correctly but have some glitches. Perhaps if there was another repository, where those packages could be promoted from testing with fewer votes, the queue would be reduced. Something like extras-not-so-testing.
My 0.02 euros.
Quote & Reply
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to v13 For This Useful Post:
attila77
,
helex
,
Khertan
v13
View Public Profile
Send a private message to v13
Visit v13's homepage!
Find all posts by v13