Thread: Would you miss the Council if it was gone?
View Single Post
v13 is offline v13
2010-08-11 , 11:06
Posts: 376 | Thanked: 511 times | Joined on Aug 2009 @ Greece
#67
Originally Posted by Matan View Post
I am trying to show that Nokia does not care at all about the N900, and the council, like many other things Nokia does, is designed to make people believe that Nokia does a lot of good things for N900, while not doing anything in fact.

About the members of the council, I'd guess that some are hoodwinked by Nokia, while others realise the truth, but hope they can do some good "working from within".
I'm sorry if you see it this way. The story of "good Nokia", "bad Nokia" is somehow pointless and utopistic to me. I only see a device that is quite open, running Linux, having a shell, being fast, etc,etc... and a community of developers, testers and fans around it. In that context, the council is OK.

You seem to have problems with Nokia, but I believe that the problem is with the concept of Nokia. Explain: It seems that you had expectations that were turned over but from my POV they don't exist at first. Anyway, since the problem is with Nokia, what you're asking is to distinguish the role of the council instead of criticizing it. Right?
 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to v13 For This Useful Post: