Frustration aside...

Here's an honest question... if our (the community's) voices were more uniform in what our grievances, concerns and requests were, would that assist the council in regards to what is important for them to convey from us to Nokia?

Or have I - and I don't mind be 100% wrong here - misinterpreted all that the council can do in terms of being a voice to Nokia?

I'm not even asking if Nokia is listening - that's an issue that I'm not trying to drag back up - but just trying to fully grasp what can, cannot be done and roles therein.

And despite being voted in and being volunteers; how well do some of the members of the council feel as if they represent the range of grievances, concerns from this community? I'll rather not single out any one or multiple council member (no need) but I know some of their concerns do not match mine, vice versa mainly because of some of their development choices or user area(s) of prior concerns.

If the council (again, I can be wrong here) are our (the community's) representatives, who exactly do they fully represent in terms of what's been addressed here ad nauseum at TMO? What are the standing concerns outside of the aforesaid Python which has the developer and advocate from Nokia involved? What other issues are on the table by the council? And is this information fully and wholly made public?

Thanks in advance. Just curious about the levels of interaction betwixt council and community.