View Single Post
Posts: 3,319 | Thanked: 5,610 times | Joined on Aug 2008 @ Finland
#66
Originally Posted by Texrat View Post
Actually asking from an end user (ie, marketing) standpoint, sorry.
Fatalsaint is right, there is no(t much) difference from a user standpoint apart from more high-end hardware coming with MeeGo and 'modest' ones coming with Symbian (and their UIs of course tweaked accordingly). This part of Nokia strategy I don't quite get. Personally, I think that it's this Qt strategy that needs to be pushed, that's the thing that can and should be made cool (I actually blogged about this). Samsung got this right - what they call Bada is in essence their (puny ) equivalent of Qt with all the extra APIs/libs (even though they got two different OSs under the hood depending on device class). Symbian as a brand value is just in freefall. MeeGo is pretty much an unknown. What is your supercool secret weapon that actually has a pretty good reputation and solid (and marketable !) name ? Qt. Well, what's the holdup then ?
__________________
Blogging about mobile linux - The Penguin Moves!
Maintainer of PyQt (see introduction and docs), AppWatch, QuickBrownFox, etc
 

The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to attila77 For This Useful Post: