View Single Post
Posts: 838 | Thanked: 292 times | Joined on Apr 2010
#26
exactly. for instance I am not saying redhat/centos/fedora is better. Actually it may be worse. but like it or not if I want to study say networking services for a job interview, there is like a 99% chance the will ask me about redhat style quirks not debian style quirks. For example I have a book called "pro linux system administration" I am reading. each chapter details both the debian/ubuntu way of doing things and the redhat/fedora way. take apache for example. the way things are layed out and enabled are totally different between the two.

I personally love the stuff easy debian makes possible like iceweasel etc and dont need that dujplicated. I just would love to have the ability to work with core linux services with a foot in both major camps...the debian and the redhat.

thanks for listening. off to repartition my sd card thanks fatalsaint.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to extendedping For This Useful Post: