View Single Post
Posts: 2,014 | Thanked: 1,581 times | Joined on Sep 2009
#102
Originally Posted by gerbick View Post
Johnel, I respect you; however I have to disagree here. Proof has yet to be delivered on both sides. To end this thread properly would require proper information.

That's the best way to settle with somebody slinging FUD is to show definitive proof otherwise. And closing this thread, he'll pop up more... a FUD hydra basically.
Unfortunately it is far more difficult to provide proof of a positive. All FUD slingers need do is produce a claim - any claim and the job of FUD is done.
To disprove it is difficult because in most cases a company does not provide a specific response to a FUD claim.

For example. All future Android releases after froyo will not provide the source tree to the public. Technically to dispute that FUD you would need a statement from Google saying it was untrue and that future releases would be opensource.

As I said much harder to disprove a negative.
__________________
Class .. : Power Poster, Potential Coder
Humor .. : [*********] Alignment: Chaotic Evil
Patience : [***-------] Weapon(s): +2 Logic Mace
Agro ... : |*****-----] Relic(s) : G1, N900

 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Bratag For This Useful Post: