View Single Post
Posts: 87 | Thanked: 40 times | Joined on May 2007
#34
Milhouse fanoush
I see, control values in registers are really differ to acheive same result.Really asymmetric prop's.Amazing! :\

penguinbait
After 2 years of Nokia's crap, isn't anyone else sick of being a beta tester. Its like QA doesn't even exist over there.
One moment, but with SDHC problem is in 2 parts.One is SDHC in Linux kernel is not ideal.Other is that cards are capable of dying just because power dropped.This is against SDHC specs so card manufacturers are IMHO responsible for releasing flawed products here as well.Of course everyone wants to be first on market.As for me, looks like Transcend and A-Data did not tested their cards well enough under different circumstances, especially taking into account that real world differs from ideal lab conditions.Or why Kingston does NOT dies?I'm played with my Kingston SDHC 8Gb Class6 a bit and still not able to kill it.Works ok for me.Imho if card can be killed by methods which are within spec it is hard to trust such card at all.But about QA I'm agree, it should be more powerful.Nokia IT OS 2007 3.2 (without skype) is much more stable than IT OS 2007 4.x (with skype).Surely, there is lots of room for QA job.I wonder why Nokia does it so poorly.