View Single Post
danramos's Avatar
Posts: 4,672 | Thanked: 5,455 times | Joined on Jul 2008 @ Springfield, MA, USA
#71
Originally Posted by Milhouse View Post
IANAL but I'd say it's the following copyright claim:

It seems to be saying that Google are inducing end users and device manufacturers to use copyrighted Oracle technology without an appropriate licence, ie. Java compilers, tools and documentation.
It doesn't specify WHAT copyrights are being violated. It's ambiguous. We're still waiting on PACER evidence related to the copyright claims but from what I read, it's unusual for the lawsuit itself to omit a list of charges regarding what is being violated.

Originally Posted by Milhouse View Post
So far I've only seen evidence that confirms the intermediary bytecode approach.
If true, that'll be interesting.