View Single Post
Posts: 82 | Thanked: 197 times | Joined on Jun 2010
#59
Originally Posted by danramos View Post
The problem with with what you just wrote is that you did, in fact, try to unhitch the N900 from Nokia as an important detail. They are the manufacturer, support and system update provider you must deal with after owning one, despite his outstanding grammar, impressive literary form and magnificent outline structure. I disagree with that whole premise (not the literary one) and I made that disagreement known. Clearly you don't agree. Now we know where we both stand with regard to how important the brand name is or isn't to either of us, negative or positive either way.



Yes, sir! Right away! Try this, for a change!
Here's some examples I found from there:
http://gadgetophilia.com/top-5-android-phones/ (Look at the LG GW620)
http://blog.laptopmag.com/dr-eye-mid...-facing-camera
etc...etc..

There's a few more out there too. All sorts of variations (keyboard with resistive touchscreen, no keyboard with resistive touchscreen, keyboard with capacitive touchscreen, etc.) if you just search for them. (i.e. http://www.mobiletechworld.com/2009/...ndroid-phones/) Their snarky "unlike all other" anti-resistive touchscreen remark, it seems like a nice unit.

Hope that helped a bit.
Thanks for the sources provided. Not specs to my liking on all of them but good effort.

Why you keep putting words in my mouth however, when my post said nothing of the sort, is to me not acceptable. This even after already I stated that "your interpretation" was not correct or even close. This to me is very disrespectful and totally unnecessary. It is what makes these forums drown in garbage these days.

I therefor welcome you to my ignore list. And also consider yourself reported. Have a nice day