View Single Post
Posts: 1,418 | Thanked: 1,541 times | Joined on Feb 2008
#24
Originally Posted by attila77 View Post
My question is who would this nomenclature change appeal to (as in, would it matter all that much, especially considering the potential confusion of swapping repositories) ? Or are you suggesting that we suggest Nokia to enable (what is now called) Extras-testing by default on the next firmware ?
I am suggesting to name the repositories according to their actual function. If Extras-Testing is no longer being used for testing, but rather for general distribution of software (as it appears to be used now), then the word -Testing must be removed. On the other hand, if Extras is actually being used by people who want to be safe from untested software, as you suggested, then it makes sense to rename it to Extras-Safe to signify its new function. As you see, my proposal simply follows your original statement about the status of Extras.